Refresh
Refresh
Source Files
| Filename | Size | Changed | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| README.SUSE | 0000001102 1.08 KB | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.141-eth-to-wlan.patch | 0000000395 395 Bytes | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.141-gcc.patch | 0000000316 316 Bytes | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.141-makefile.patch | 0000000491 491 Bytes | over 5 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.248-r3-Wno-date-time.patch | 0000000421 421 Bytes | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.271-r1-linux-3.18.patch | 0000000326 326 Bytes | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.271-r2-linux-4.3-v2.patch | 0000000408 408 Bytes | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.271-r4-linux-4.7.patch | 0000003897 3.81 KB | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-sta-6.30.223.271-r4-linux-4.8.patch | 0000001835 1.79 KB | almost 8 years | |
| broadcom-wl-blacklist | 0000000160 160 Bytes | over 12 years | |
| broadcom-wl.changes | 0000001678 1.64 KB | over 5 years | |
| broadcom-wl.linux-4.11.patch | 0000000671 671 Bytes | over 7 years | |
| broadcom-wl.linux-4.12.patch | 0000001953 1.91 KB | over 7 years | |
| broadcom-wl.linux-4.14.patch | 0000000357 357 Bytes | about 7 years | |
| broadcom-wl.linux-4.15.patch | 0000001199 1.17 KB | almost 7 years | |
| broadcom-wl.linux-5.1.patch | 0000000678 678 Bytes | over 5 years | |
| broadcom-wl.spec | 0000004219 4.12 KB | over 5 years | |
| hybrid-v35-nodebug-pcoem-6_30_223_271.tar.gz | 0002869247 2.74 MB | almost 8 years | |
| hybrid-v35_64-nodebug-pcoem-6_30_223_271.tar.gz | 0002928541 2.79 MB | almost 8 years |
Comments for broadcom-wl 3
vovochka404 wrote over 2 years ago
Hi, manfred, thanks for you job! Can you please add building of ueficert package support, like it was done for https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:Sauerland/broadcom-wl/broadcom-wl.spec?expand=1 to support secure boot?
manfred.h wrote about 1 year ago
Dear @vovochka404, please accept my humblest apologies! I wasn't ignoring you, but I simply did not receive your message. To generate an e-mail, one has to use @"user", so if you had written "Hi, @manfred.h", I would have received your message...
Anyway, I am currently discussing this matter with @Sauerland to find a solution for merging his stuff with mine. Please expect the changed package soon which will enable you to use secure boot.
BTW, do you still have the broadcom Wifi interface? I ask because I don't have any anymore, which is why I cannot test anything myself. Would be great if I could ping you when changes are necessary!
manfred-h wrote about 1 year ago
@manfred.h wouldn't have worked either, because there must not be a "." in a username... I have a new username "manfred-h" now. Another issue was that I hadn't enabled the notifications for comments - shame on me!